Redclear
From SarahConnor
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 01:39, 21 February 2008 (edit) Thebruce (Talk | contribs) (New page: == "REDCLEAR" Protocol == * First mentioned February 18th, 2008 by the Skynet Embedded Network, after effectively losing control of its T-Units (having its communication method interc...) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (19:17, 25 February 2008) (edit) (undo) DavFlamerock (Talk | contribs) (→Descriptions/References) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
-2/20/08- | -2/20/08- | ||
: ENITECH WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAFEGUARD AGAINST [REDCLEAR] PROTOCOL. STAND DOWN. | : ENITECH WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAFEGUARD AGAINST [REDCLEAR] PROTOCOL. STAND DOWN. | ||
+ | -2/25/08- | ||
+ | :REDCLEAR PROTOCOL AS FOLLOWS: ALL T-UNITS STAND DOWN AND STAND CLEAR OF ENITECH TARGET DURING ACTIVATION // DO NOT ATTEMPT TO APPROACH TARGETS DURING EXECUTION OF REDCLEAR // CONFIRM | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | Current Theory: nuclear strike? |
Current revision
[edit] "REDCLEAR" Protocol
- First mentioned February 18th, 2008 by the Skynet Embedded Network, after effectively losing control of its T-Units (having its communication method intercepted by people helping the Resistance).
- Skynet encouraged all units to either stand down or self-terminate after deciding to implement the REDCLEAR protocol, in an effort to eliminate Enitech.
[edit] Descriptions/References
-2/18/08-
-2/20/08-
-2/20/08-
-2/20/08-
-2/25/08-
|
Current Theory: nuclear strike?